Editorial Policy


Providing information is different from describing what is going on in a country and how events occurring elsewhere in the world affect that country. One cannot overstate the value of setting and perspective. Our reporters and editors put a premium on focusing on real people, rather than just institutions, so that readers can see how global events affect their daily lives.

In our time-starved society, every story needs to work overtime to win over readers. If a news article makes no attempt to engage its audience or pique their curiosity, they will quickly click away to another site, turn the page, or change the channel.

Although the specifics of our job may evolve, the underlying principles that direct our efforts remain constant. We must always act in a completely unbiased, fair, and honest manner. Here, we’re dealing with provable facts backed by credible, expert testimony. To get to the bottom of a situation, we investigate all potential outcomes thoroughly.

In terms of importance, precision cannot be overstated. Any mistake that is found must be corrected immediately. Articles that have already been published or broadcast should not be corrected hesitantly or infrequently. They should be written to repair the damage as completely as possible.

All that we do here is crucial. For a news organization with 24-hour deadlines, speed is of the utmost importance. However, dependability is always more valuable than speed.

One’s sense of taste is crucial. Some of the information that is crucial is truly revolting. That is not how it needs to be approached.


Everyone here, from reporters to editors to managers, is responsible for adhering to theleafdesk.com’s high standards. Since there are so many ways to cover and present news, it’s tough to establish universally applicable guidelines. As part of their jobs, our staff must follow a number of established procedures.

The following are examples of some of the most important of these methods:

Before airing any story or naming any person in a story if there are even the slightest grounds for suspicion, a full investigation should be conducted. If you are unsure, remove it. But don’t let this convince you to abandon the further investigation into a previously dismissed viewpoint. An exhaustive analysis of the data must produce genuine uncertainty.

Any information that has a questionable origin should be backed up by a credible reference. In case your submission is rejected, you should get your proof ready for publication.

Try to remain neutral when discussing recent events that could affect a conflicting party. Be sure to present each side of the argument in an even fashion.

Just state the facts without adding any commentary or opinion. There should be no expression of the reporter’s personal views in the copy. The results of their investigation are fascinating. If the reader is to make sense of intricate matters, they need access to reliable historical context and expert analysis.

It’s important to fix mistakes as soon as possible. The worryingly widespread public mistrust of the news media. Many factors contribute to the public’s mistrust, such as inaccuracy, carelessness, disregard for public opinion, an inherent bias against those in authority, a perception of unfairness, and other signs of arrogance.

By maintaining rigorous factual standards and an unwavering dedication to justice, theleafdesk.com can aid in changing public perceptions. We shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss journalists who refuse to accept criticism and complaints from their peers.

Stories in the media can have negative effects on both ordinary people and large corporations. In order to maintain the honesty and maturity of theleafdesk.com, it is essential that managers and staff members respond quickly and thoughtfully to mistakes. It makes no difference whether a complaint is filed by a frightened individual working alone or by the legal team of a powerful individual.

It is imperative that all false stories be reported to the appropriate authorities so that they can be rectified.

Moral Conduct

One of our duties as journalists is to avoid doing anything that would bring disrepute on the field or undermine public trust in the news we report. We must uphold strict ethical standards and be seen to uphold them because we reveal terrible news about politicians who become dishonest, caregivers who abuse their trust, and business executives who abandon ethics for profit.

Attempting to solve every conceivable ethical problem that may arise during this investigation is difficult. Our work is not constrained by any of the following principles; rather, they serve as a framework within which we conduct ourselves.

An individual’s pride in themselves and their work as a journalist is a source of motivation for moral conduct.

In other words, the tech sector can financially back itself. Anyone on staff should refuse to agree to anything that would damage our reputation.

Journalists contributing their time to theleafdesk.com in the form of interviews, photos, videos, or audio recordings will not be compensated.

Reporters covering the technology beat never stretch the truth to make a story. They always say that they’re reporters.


Impartiality is like going for a run. You need to work out on a regular basis if you want to gain muscle and tone.

Asking oneself, “Am I being as unbiased, honest, and fair as I can be?” is a great way to practice objectivity.

Variants on Objectivity Principles

Whether the conflict is political, legal, or otherwise, all parties are given the same consideration. It is important to give equal weight to statements made by parties with competing interests, whether they are used together in the same story or at different times.

When publishing at the same time, however, it’s important to get diverse perspectives.

If an assault on another entity has been reported, any official responses to the allegations will also be shared. If you are unable to find a reliable resource, say so and continue your search.

If someone disagrees with you, you should investigate their credentials. Think about whether or not the report needs to be made if there is no relevant expertise or if the person making the report does not hold a position of authority.


The quotes in a story are the blood that keeps it alive. They look like they have a story to tell with the slightest blush on their cheeks. They infuse your message with more credibility, significance, and weight.

Abuse of them could cause problems for writers and publishers. Some media outlets give their reporters leeway when paraphrasing quotes. If any attempt is made to alter the content of this post, theleafdesk.com will respond severely.

Direct quotations of people are almost always presented in standard English. We correct egregious grammatical errors that give the impression of poor writing. We edit out the umms, use, and ahs from your speech, along with any other unnecessary filler. We correct misspelled words and other typos in electronic messages like emails and texts. We do not change the quotations when this is not the case.

We don’t usually use nonstandard spellings and grammar to show dialects or mispronunciations, but they can help set the mood.

Removing or paraphrasing this tweet from a teenage fan would have eliminated a crucial part of a story about the pop singer Justin Bieber’s use of Twitter:

I have no idea if @justinbieber ever even looks at my tweets, but I’ll keep trying!

Bafflegab quotations, no matter how well-known the original speaker, is often rendered in plain English.


There will be no profanity. preservation of morality.

Moreover, a word of warning regarding translations. We shouldn’t presume that a non-native speaker of English can communicate with us in the language.

It should be stated clearly in interviews and public speeches what language is being utilized if it is not already obvious. An example would be a news conference held in bilingual French and English, where the introductory remarks were made in French. Noting that a translation was employed is appropriate when discussing the language of protest signs or the chants of the crowd.

Direct or indirect quotations that are based on a translation rather than the precise words spoken owe it to the reader to disclose this fact.


Since theleafdesk.com has switched to an online news service, the news story can reach a wider audience than ever before. It has become increasingly common for stories to go through fewer editors before being published. Thanks to developments in technology, we no longer have to go through a censored middleman to get our content to our viewers, listeners, and readers.

Managers at theleafdesk.com take the company’s policy against profanity very seriously, and their employees know and follow it.

Except in extremely rare and extraordinary cases, obscene language has no place in any form of journalistic reporting.

Four-letter obscenities yelled by the crowd or scribbled on a sign by an angry demonstrator contribute nothing to the story. The use of profanity solely for the sake of using vulgarity conveys no information to the reader, listener, or observer.

Explicit language has its place in the news, but only under certain circumstances. If a famous person were to use foul language in public, that would be an example. In other cases, the use of profanity is necessary to grasp the essential details or emotions at play.

However, this sort of thing happens quite seldom.

Journalists covering an issue should constantly consider alternatives to using foul language before using it. Obscenities that are integral to the story should be reported to a senior Main Desk editor before any transmission of text, audio, or visual content.


Every news story has the potential to offend someone. It’s important to tread carefully while reporting on sensitive topics like age, race, sex, disability, and religion.

When defining age, race, creed, nationality, physical appearance, religion, sex, sexual orientation, and any other grouping that could potentially offend someone, it is important to do so fairly, sensitively, and in good taste.


We must stick to our commitments of secrecy when we make them. It is only appropriate to let potential providers know that it is not a promise. Reporters may be ordered by courts to divulge their sources.

Verbal agreements with sources are legally binding and enforceable in court. Make sure you and your source know the agreement’s conditions before you get the information. Don’t agree to anything you can’t keep.

For instance, you could consent to not naming the source by name in your piece or to keep the source’s identity a secret from anybody other than your employer. You cannot promise that the source won’t suffer if their identity is made public, whether by mistake or as a consequence of a court order.

An employee’s failure to follow a court order won’t be asked of them by theleafdesk.com, nor will it be advised. It will offer legal assistance, either to advise the employee and apply for a closed hearing or to advise the court that disclosure is not needed in the public interest.

Additionally, sources should be told that reporters must reveal their sources to their supervisors. It might be anyone, from the president to the bureau’s news editor. This does not demand that every member of the chain of command be informed of the circumstance. A staff member may personally approach the Editor-in-Chief or the President in a delicate case.

Top management will endeavor to warn the original worker in advance if a source needs to be disclosed above the President’s level.

theleafdesk.com may occasionally not be able to corroborate a highly sensitive news tip with further sources due to the need for complete secrecy. Senior management will consult with the original employee in this scenario. If the circumstances make carrying the material impracticable, we won’t do it.

As part of effective reporting, readers should be provided as much background information about the unnamed source as is practical. This makes it easier for readers to judge whether or not the story is worthwhile. The credentials of the unknown source must never be fraudulent. You should be able to produce a description that is informative to the reader and respectful of the source with a tiny bit of consideration.

It could be vital to obtain guidance from the source on how to frame such a description so that the story can inform the reader without giving away the character’s identity

When pressed for additional information, some informants may supply data that can be linked to a specific individual but then demand anonymity. Since it would be deceptive to imply that this sensitive knowledge came from someone else, it is tough to attribute it (another Economy Department official, asked for anonymity, said) (another Economy Department official, who asked for anonymity, said). Generally speaking, it is better to apply terms like It was also learned.

Additional tools for connecting with unknown sources include:

Use anonymous sources provided by others as though they were provided by theleafdesk.com. Stories from newspapers or television that use anonymous sources should attribute them to the publication or broadcaster: Unidentified officials from the Energy Department reportedly told Washington

The narrative should express the source’s demand for anonymity and offer a reason for it.

Officials and spokespeople should not be confused. A spokesman represents the thoughts of others, whereas an official helps influence those opinions.

When a made-up name is employed, such as when referring to a difficult teen or a welfare family, or when a composite person is constructed to stand in for a group of similar individuals, the ruse needs to be uncovered as fast as practical. It’s a tool that you can’t use all the time without losing its effectiveness. It must be discussed with a supervisor before use.


The internet and social networking sites like Facebook, where anyone may share information, have revolutionized how news is gathered. Internet research is generally the first point of call for journalists. Locating people who might have direct knowledge of a key event, spotting news tips or trends, finding new sources, and confirming historical details are just a few uses for it.

The same copyright restrictions apply to content from websites as they do to content from print publications. When paraphrasing, proper credit must be given, and quotation marks must be used when utilized word for word. By giving correct attribution, you can prevent mistakenly adding other people’s words to your writing.


Errors are unavoidable. Untrue information is reported. When this occurs, getting it rectified as soon as possible should be the major focus.

While other sorts of information may be accessible for much longer, web stories are normally accessible for at least 24 hours. Although websites can only keep theleafdesk.com content up for a limited period of time per contract, many stories are commonly kept online for much longer. Online tales can take many distinct formats, in contrast to those in newspapers. They can always be updated because they are current web news. This means that there is a significantly broader window for finishing a Writethru to rectify an error than the regular newspaper deadline cycle.

In order to handle issues or potential concerns with narratives, theleafdesk.com adopts the following techniques:

Writethru Correction alters the facts or the phrasing.

Kill - eliminates a false, harmful in terms of the law, or injurious tale.

uses Writethru Correction Sub to replace a narrative that has been killed.

Corrective — applied to rectify an error that has presumably already been printed. It was made explicitly with the goal of confronting the error and resetting the record. It exclusively addresses facts that have been demonstrated to be false.


The computer business values privacy highly. We don’t condone breaching someone’s privacy without cause. It is against the organization’s policy to publicly expose private behavior, information, or discussion unless an agreement is asked under extreme circumstances.

When reporting on death, pain, and despair, we believe that the victim’s identity should be preserved and that images that demean the deceased should be avoided.

Copyright and Other Intellectual Property Rights

Examples of intellectual property rights include the following:

Copyright defends industrial designs, trademarks, and geographical markers.

This subject is covered under the Copyright Act, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, the Patents Act, and the Designs Act.